Friday, 4 July 2014

QMobile Noir i5 Price






About :
QMobile Noir i5 Price in Pakistan, Spec & Reviews. QMobile Noir i5 is up in the market within very reasonable price, somehow the device holds good attractive feature that makes Noir i5 a complete mobile phone for your use. This device holds strong hardware side like its siblings, it runs Android 4.0 Operating System. It has 5 mega pixel back camera with auto focus detection and 2 mega pixel camera for selfies. This smart device is all come up with 2000 mAh battery. Average rating is 4.4 stars, based on 34 reviews


General:


2G Network SIM 1: 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900, SIM 2: 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G Network WCDMA 900 / 2100
SIM Dual-Sim



Body:


Dimensions 138.5x71.5x9.5mm
Weight N/a


Display:

Type IPS LCD Screen
Size 4.7 Inches WVGA



Sound:

Alert types Downloadable, Polyphonic, MP3
Loudspeaker Yes
3.5mm jack Yes



Memory:

Card slot microSD card (supports up to 32GB)
Internal 4GB ROM, 512MB RAM


Data:

GPRS Yes
EDGE Yes
WLAN WLAN (Wi-Fi 802.11)
Bluetooth Yes
NFC
Infrared port No



Camera:

Primary 5 Mega Pixel
Features autofocus
Video Yes
Secondary 2 Mega Pixel


Features:


OS Android 4.0
CPU 1.3 GHZ Quad-Core
Sensors Light, Motion, Proximity, Magnetic
Messaging SMS(threaded view), MMS, Email, Push Mail, IM
Browser HTML
GPS GPS + A-GPS support
Colors Black, Yellow, Red, Orange



Battery:



2000 mAh
Stand-by
Talk time

Do you want to sell your QMobile Noir i5?Post your add in Comment 









Thursday, 3 July 2014

World Cup 2014: Algeria to donate $9m World Cup prize money to people of Gaza, because ‘they need it more than us’



Algeria to donate $9m World Cup prize money to people of Gaza, because ‘they need it more than us’


The Algerian national football team are to donate their entire World Cup prize fund to the embattled people of Gaza, it has been reported.
According to quotes attributed to Algeria’s star striker Islam Slimani, the team will give up all of the estimated $9 million (£5.25 million) they received as valiant losers in the round of 16
.
Though Slimani himself plays for Sporting Lisbon and is touted for an even bigger move this summer, the reported donation will be a greater sacrifice for members of the squad based at more modest clubs in Algeria, Tunisia, the lower French leagues and Watford.
Yet speaking at a reception in Algiers where the team returned to a hero's welcome yesterday, Slimani apparently said: “They need it more than us.” The announcement was reported by the Jordanian football writer Waleed Abu Nada as well as the Dutch daily newspaper Algemeen Dagblad.


he Algerian team had already won support from around the world for their gutsy and creative performances throughout the tournament against more favoured nations.
They reached the knockout stages for the first time their history when a second-half Slimani goal saw them go through against Russia – and at Russia’s expense.


And they were actually the better side for large parts of their second round match against giants Germany, only losing after extra time 2-1.
If reports of their donation to Gaza are true, it will see Algeria gain a whole new set of fans beyond football around the world. They were also the only African side to make it through past the group stages – and their apparent willingness to give away the prize money is in stark contrast to the reported behaviour of the Cameroon, Ghana and Nigeria teams.
But they may also face accusations of bringing politics to bear in the world of sport, as Argentina did when they were investigated by Fifa for showing a banner about the Falklands ahead of the tournament.
Algeria have traditionally been strong supporters of the Palestinian cause in the long-running  Middle East dispute with Israel centred on Gaza, and YouTube footage of the team’s open-top homecoming tour through Algiers yesterday showed at least one Palestinian flag draped from the bus by the players.

 The reported donation to the people of Gaza comes at a critical time in the conflict, as Israel’s prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu struggles to control a frenzied reaction to the murder of three Israeli hitch-hikers, which the country blames on Hamas.
Israel has begun sending troop reinforcements to its border with Gaza and begun intensifying air strikes, while more than a dozen Palestinian rockets struck southern Israel early this morning.

Wednesday, 2 July 2014

The United States Had To Lose; They Didn't Have To Lose Valiantly



The United States had to lose; they had to go home. It was in the nature of things.
Soccer is strange, in that it isn't very strange at all. One would think that such a low-scoring game would lend itself to randomness, to the odd fairytale ending, to relatively shitty teams fluking their way into the history books. This doesn't happen.
In the end, soccer doesn't leave much room for hope. Quality always wins out, and nowhere is this more obvious than the World Cup. Every four years, 32 teams descend upon a nation to compete for the title of best team in the world. The tournaments, as we have already seen this year, appear crazy in the moment, close up. But when the smoke clears, the best teams in the world always emerge unscathed, victorious. After a hectic group stage, all eight group winners won in the round of 16. Looking back, seven of eight group winners advanced in 2010, and no one was surprised when Spain hoisted the trophy at tournament's end. Italy were the world's best team in 2006. Brazil had the best collection of talent in 2002, as France did in 1998. So it goes.
Soccer is different from hockey, or baseball, or football, or college basketball, in that it's coldly predictable, for mysterious reasons that no one can really adequately explain. Cinderella doesn't exist in this world—there are no Miracles on Ice, no 1969 New York Mets, no Buster Douglases—and through that specific lens, if you were so inclined, you could call it un-American.
USMNT manager Jürgen Klinsmann understood this, and said as much before the tournament.
"We cannot win this World Cup, because we are not at that level yet," Klinsmann told The New York Times. "For us, we have to play the game of our lives seven times to win the tournament."
It was true. The United States aren't a world soccer superpower, and to make matters worse, they were drawn into the Group of Death, the most difficult in the tournament. Not only that, but their group stage schedule ensured that they'd be traveling farther than any other nation in the tournament, and that they were to play in the steamy, hellish city of Manaus located in the rainforest.
Still, the manager's frankness sparked an outcry all through the country, with the loudest yelps coming from ESPN columnist-cum-talking head Michael Wilbon, who called Klinsmann gutless and told the German to "get out of America." Klinsmann and the USMNT flew to Brazil for the tournament, but did so without Landon Donovan, considered the greatest American soccer player ever. Instead, he brought players like Julian Green, Chris Wondolowski, and Brad Davis. The decision felt cynical. It felt like, before the tournament even kicked off, Klinsmann had already given up. 



It only took one minute into the match against Ghana for everything to change, when captain Clint Dempsey cut from left to right inside the box and slotted a shot off the far post and into the back of the net. We allowed ourselves to hope, even when Ghana threw their might against the U.S. defense, and even after they equalized. The United States game-winner was a header from 21-year-old center back John Brooks, who'd entered the game at the half, and wasn't really expected to play in the tournament at all. His triumph was a fairytale in miniature, the kind of thing that could almost get you believing in the impossible.
But in the first half of the match, the Americans had lost starting striker Jozy Altidore to a hamstring injury. He'd miss the rest of the tournament. Altidore is not a particularly good player, and in any case, he'd just come off a comically bad year for English club Sunderland, where he tallied just one goal and an assist in 31 appearances. Still, he is one of the USMNT's best players, and the loss of his physical presence and ability to hold up play meant that Klinsmann and the USMNT would have to completely change their tactics for the duration of the tournament, so that at times they looked like something out of an archaic black-and-white film of England in the 1950s.
If this was the death knell, the Americans didn't realize it. Without Altidore, the USMNT traveled to Manaus for a match against Portugal and Cristiano Ronaldo. The Americans played the game of their lives in the rainforest against the No. 4 team in the world. They outplayed the Portuguese. They drew.
Next, they faced tournament favorites Germany in a stadium in a city flooded from rain, and once more we allowed ourselves to hope. The Germans destroyed the United States, but broke through only once, and even though they lost, the USMNT had done the improbable and—with an assist from Portugal—advanced to the knockout stages, where Belgium awaited.
The Belgians, stacked as they were, struggled through the group stage of the tournament, and so again, American fans allowed themselves to hope. Hell, some of us even felt confident.
But fairytale endings in sports are about randomness, which is to say that they're about undeserving teams winning. Belgium were the better team with the better players. The United States were overmatched, but they tried anyway.
More than anything, the Americans fought, out of pride and out of fear and out of hope. Old, makeshift left back DaMarcus Beasley was ferocious. Michael Bradley, who'd been conspicuously absent for a majority of the tournament, was everywhere. When Fabian Johnson couldn't continue after pulling his hamstring, speedy 19-year-old DeAndre Yedlin entered at right back and looked a constant threat until the final whistle.
They were demolished.
The Americans almost conceded a goal 40 seconds into the match, but Belgium were denied by Tim Howard, who, in his greatest and maybe final performance on the national team, would have to make 15 more saves throughout the game, the most of any keeper in 50 years. Belgium finished the match with 39 shots, the fourth-highest since 1966. These were hockey numbers.



After 90 minutes, though, somehow the game was tied. Then, 30 seconds before overtime, American poacher Chris Wondolowski found himself free, six yards from goal, with a chance to put the Americans through. He missed.
Belgian forward Romelu Lukaku was introduced in the first minute of overtime, and two minutes later, he created a Kevin De Bruyne goal. In the 105th minute, Lukaku scored. It was over. American fans began to mourn.
The national team, however, didn't. Klinsmann introduced Julian Green, America's latest crowned savior, after the goal. In the 107th minute, Green sliced into the box from the left, and on his first touch, Green volleyed a chipped Bradley pass into the net. This, too, was a fairytale in miniature. Americans everywhere gasped. Again, we hoped.
In the second half of overtime, the United States dominated the Belgians. Seven of the USMNT's 17 shots came in the last 15 minutes. Six minutes before time, the Americans executed a perfect set piece that found Clint Dempsey in on goal, six yards out. He missed. Then the final whistle blew, and Belgium emerged the deserved winners.
Through a specific, objective lens, it would have been a travesty, an affront to the game itself, if the United States had won. And this is what Klinsmann was talking about before the tournament. His message has never been that this country can't win—it's that it can't yet, because it hasn't earned it and because there are no shortcuts. The Americans were doomed by history and by the nature of the game before they ever touched down, destined to be trumped by teams that looked at soccer as religion, to teams that prepared for decades to win this very tournament, to teams that deserved it more.
And through this specific lens, we can truly appreciate the beauty of the USMNT's World Cup. Klinsmann spoke about the tournament as if the die was already cast because it was. In the end, the Americans won, then drew, then lost twice. They were an also-ran, completely mediocre, ousted before the tournament truly began in earnest, and will be forgotten to almost all in a few years' time.
They weren't close to winning the World Cup, just as they won't be in 2018, or in 2022. Because their death was always certain, though, what mattered wasn't what happened, but how. It would've been no great shame or surprise if they'd given way to nihilism, but even though the Americans only briefly played well, they still fought valiantly, against the very nature of soccer itself, until they were cut down by an overwhelming foe and carried out on their shields.
We knew how it would end, and still we applauded. They couldn't have done any better, or any more.


Windows Phone 8.1 Update Coming Soon

               Windows Phone 8.1 Update Coming Soon

 

Windows Phone users can rejoice, as you are going to have your hands on the new update very shortly. Microsoft has leaked that they plan to release the new 8.1 update within the first two weeks of July to select (most) 7.0 and 8.0 users. Of course, this may not mean you will be getting it since most users will have to wait until their ISP releases their own version of it. Until then, all developer unlocked phones will be able to take advantage of the update (or in most cases have already been using it).
The new update comes packed with a lot of the features requested on Microsoft’s voice/vote website, including the ability to search your text messages, more tiles space, a notification center, app folder feature, new store design, automatic app updates (optional), updates to calendar app – camera – bing – browser and more, file manager and so much more.
The most noticeable change is the availability of the new voice command/AI “Cortana” from Halo video games, which will act as your personal assistance across multiple devices (eventually), including phones, tablets, PCs and the Xbox One console.
So many wanted changes will be provided with the new update, and users across the world have been waiting (im)patiently hoping that this will give Windows Phone the shift it needs to compete with its adversaries.
Hopefully the ISPs won’t drag their feet too long before allowing the update to their customers. AT&T in particular has been known for doing this in the past.

T-Mobile Sony Xperia T2 Ultra will launch on July 23

                         Sony Xperia T2 Ultra Coming Soon


According to TmoNews, the Sony Xperia T2 Ultra will be coming to T-Mboile on July 23. Great battery life, great design, and great camera, Xperia T2 ultra is definitely the best mid range phablet in the market..I like this phone, cheap and good. Of course, cannot compare to high end flagship.

Sony Xperia T2 Ultra Specs:
- 6-inch Triluminos screen with 720×1280 pixel resolution.
- quad-core 1.4GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 processor
- 1GB of RAM
- 8GB storage with microSD
- 13-megapixel camera, F2.4;
- NFC
- 3000 mAh embedded battery
- Available in white, black, and purple
- Size: 165.2 x 83.8 x 7.65 mm, 171g
- Android 4.4.2 Kitkat
Sony website confirmed T2 ultra and many others going to get Kitkat on July mid week.













Tuesday, 1 July 2014

Google Aims to Defrag Android Universe

Google is taking a different tack with Android for things other than smartphones. "Instead of trying to tackle fragmentation after the fact, ... they're trying to get ahead of it and trying to prevent fragmentation from happening," said Lookout Mobile Security's Marc Rogers. "We have millions of smartphones, and we're anticipating 10 billion things. You can imagine the scale of the problem."

 

As any Android user knows, the version of the operating system you're using can vary widely because it depends on parties other than Google. That's why nearly two-thirds of users are running a version of Android introduced in 2012 or earlier.
With Android making the leap to wearables and the Internet of Things (IoT), however, Google is aiming to make that kind of fragmentation of its mobile operating system a thing of the past. It plans to limit what a hardware maker can do to the Android interface and control updates to the operating system.
"I think Google has discovered that an open operating system is nice to get a lot of units deployed, but it doesn't necessarily provide a consistent user experience," Yankee Group Vice President Carl.

"They could have chosen to exercise more control when they started," he added. "They chose not to. If they had, they might not have gotten the rate of adoption they got."
Google did not respond to our request to comment for this story.


Bold Move

The move toward greater control over Android in wearables, autos and TVs makes sense, said Ross Rubin, principal analyst with Reticle Research.
With smartphones, people typically are wedded to one device, but a person may have multiple watches and TVs.
"Google wants to enforce more consistency across different devices from different brands, which is less important in the smartphone market," Rubin told Haqk.blogspot.com.
"It's also an opportunity for Google to address industry criticism about difficulties in upgrading to new versions of Android," he added.
Times have changed since Google was an upstart in a market dominated by Apple.
"Google may feel emboldened to do this at this point, because it feels the polish and functionality of its user interface is such that it can deliver a good, consistent user experience in these products," Rubin said.
If what Google is doing on the IoT side of Android catches on among consumers, it could influence the smartphone side of the operating system as well.
"If initiatives like TVs and smartwatches take off, consumers will want more consistency between those products and their phones, so Google will have more negotiating leverage to insist on cleaner software interfaces from their phone partners."

Getting Ahead of the Curve

Choosing to exercise control over Android now, as it enters the IoT market, as opposed to later is a smart move, contended Marc Rogers, a principal security researcher at Lookout Mobile Security.
"Instead of trying to tackle fragmentation after the fact, as they did with the smartphone industry, they're trying to get ahead of it and trying to prevent fragmentation from happening with things," Rogers told Haqk.blogspot.com.
"We have millions of smartphones, and we're anticipating 10 billion things," he continued. "You can imagine the scale of the problem with an exponential increase in manufacturers all modifying Google's code."
Google's tightening the reins on Android for things will reduce the kind of variety found in the smartphone market, but that's not necessarily a bad thing, he noted.
"From a security perspective, less variability and predictability is a good thing," Rogers said. "The less manufacturers have to tweak and code themselves, the less of a headache Google has managing security."

Security Problems

Fragmentation often is viewed as a contributor to Android's security problems.
"When a vulnerability is discovered, the ability to get a patch or move to the latest upgrade isn't in the hands of Google; it's in the hands of the hardware vendor," noted Michael Sutton, vice president of security research at Zscaler.
"We've seen many situations over time where some vulnerability is discovered, and end users end up waiting for -- or in some cases never get -- a patch that they need, because it has to be blessed by the hardware vendor," he told Haqk.blogspot.com.
By the same token, as Google improves the security of Android over time, many users can't take advantage of those advances because they're not allowed to upgrade their versions of the OS.
"If you can't upgrade to that latest edition, you can't benefit from those improvements," Sutton said.
Reducing or even eliminating fragmentation won't end Android's security problems, however.
"I still consider Android less secure than other operating systems -- even if it's the latest version," NSS Labs Practice Manager Chris Morales told Haqk.blogspot.com
"There tend to be more flaws with Android than in Windows Phone or iOS," he said.
"I don't know, though, if that's because it's targeted more often or it actually has more issues," he added. "A lot of times more flaws are found because a platform has lots of users."

Tariq Jameel Bayan

 

Copyright @ 2013 Haqk Articles.